On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:35:58 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > The TPO TPG110 bindings were using the DPI bindings (popular > in the fbdev subsystem) but this misses the finer points > learned in the DRM subsystem. > > We need to augment the bindings for proper DRM integration: > the timings are expressed by the hardware, not put into the > device tree. I.e. this hardware is self-describing and can > report the resolutions and timings needed. It should not > be described in the device tree. > > Further the device was incorrectly modeled with GPIO lines > instead of an SPI child, even though the device was using > SPI. > > No known deployments of the device using device tree > exist, so it should be fine to augment the bindings. > > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > ChangeLog v2->v3: > - Rewrite to reflect the fact that the display should be > an SPI child device using 3WIRE SPI. > ChangeLog v1->v2: > - Expand some sections to make it clear what kind of device > this is and that the serial protocol it uses is not > I2C. > --- > .../bindings/display/panel/tpo,tpg110.txt | 83 ++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
