Please copy Li Yang <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx> who has been added to
MAINTAINERS as co-maintainer for LayerScape platform.
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 03:53:45PM +0530, Pramod Kumar wrote:
> From: Bhaskar Upadhaya <Bhaskar.Upadhaya@xxxxxxx>
>
> FRWY-LS1012A is a different design from LS1012A-FRDM,
LS1012A-FRWY is more consistent?
> but has some common SoC features. Key feature on this
> board is Micro SD, USB 3.0, DDR, UART.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Upadhaya <Bhaskar.Upadhaya@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar_1@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> changes in v1:
> 1. fix license identifier
> 2. remove pcie node
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile | 1 +
> .../boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-frwy.dts | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-frwy.dts
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile
> index 86e18adb695a..d1161442ff2f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) += fsl-ls1012a-frwy.dtb
In alphabetic order, it should go after fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dtb.
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) += fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) += fsl-ls1012a-qds.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) += fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-frwy.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-frwy.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e75a8dc0dda5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-frwy.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Device Tree file for Freescale LS1012A FRWY Board.
> + *
> + * Copyright 2018 NXP
> + *
> + * Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar_1@xxxxxxx>
> + *
> + */
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "fsl-ls1012a.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "LS1012A FRWY Board";
> + compatible = "fsl,frwy-ls1012a", "fsl,ls1012a";
I think fsl,<soc>-xxx is the idiomatic approach we define a compatible.
Also the board compatible should be documented.
> +
Unneeded newline.
Shawn
> +};
> +
> +&duart0 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&i2c0 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
