On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 04:34:14PM -0700, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 04:32:00PM -0700, Vinod wrote: > > Hi Mani, > > > > On 18-09-18, 15:52, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 09:35:12AM -0700, Vinod wrote: > > > > On 01-09-18, 22:12, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > > > > > > > > @@ -364,6 +372,26 @@ static inline int owl_dma_cfg_lli(struct owl_dma_vchan *vchan, > > > > > OWL_DMA_MODE_DT_DCU | OWL_DMA_MODE_SAM_INC | > > > > > OWL_DMA_MODE_DAM_INC; > > > > > > > > > > + break; > > > > > + case DMA_MEM_TO_DEV: > > > > > + mode |= OWL_DMA_MODE_TS(vchan->drq) > > > > > + | OWL_DMA_MODE_ST_DCU | OWL_DMA_MODE_DT_DEV > > > > > + | OWL_DMA_MODE_SAM_INC | OWL_DMA_MODE_DAM_CONST; > > > > > + > > > > > + /* Handle bus width for UART */ > > > > > + if (sconfig->dst_addr_width == DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE) > > > > > + mode |= OWL_DMA_MODE_NDDBW_8BIT; > > > > > > > > this is fine per se, but not correct way to handle in dmaengine driver. > > > > You should be agnostic to user of dmaengine, so handle all the buswidths > > > > the IP block supports and update the values accordingly. That way new > > > > uses can be added w/o requiring change in dmaengine driver > > > > > > Currently, all members of Owl family supports only 32bit and 8bit > > > bus widths. 32bit is common for all peripherals and 8bit applies to only > > > UART since the internal buffer is 8bit wide. So, this makes sense to me! > > > > Above you are onky handing DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE and not 32bit which > > this IP supports.. You should handle all widths supported vt hardware.. > > > > Hi Vinod, > > Default width is 32bit and we will only override it for UART... Should I > add a comment stating this? > I think it is better to select 32bit mode eventhough it is the default one. Will update it in next revision. Thanks, Mani > Thanks, > Mani > > > -- > > ~Vinod
