Hi Leo,
On 12/09/18 11:17, leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Suzuki,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:17:05AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
Switch to updated coresight bindings for hw ports
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
index 7b32b89..5bed52b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
@@ -1099,10 +1099,11 @@
clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_QDSS_CLK>, <&rpmcc RPM_QDSS_A_CLK>;
clock-names = "apb_pclk", "atclk";
- port {
- tpiu_in: endpoint {
- slave-mode;
- remote-endpoint = <&replicator_out1>;
+ out-ports {
Here should be in-ports for tpiu node?
BTW, if upper comment is valid, this means the DT binding doc also
gives wrong example for tpiu node [1].
You are right on both counts.
I tested this patch with upper changing to 'in-ports', etm with perf
mode can work well on DB410c board.
Thanks a lot for the testing. I will fix both the problems.
Suzuki
