Hi Philipp Thanks for the quick response... Please find my response inline. > -----Original Message----- > From: Philipp Zabel [mailto:p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 4:00 PM > To: Nava kishore Manne <navam@xxxxxxxxxx>; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; Michal Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rajan Vaja > <RAJANV@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@xxxxxxxxxx>; > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] reset: reset-zynqmp: Adding support for Xilinx > zynqmp reset controller. > > Hi, > > thank you for the patch. I have a few comments below: > > On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:39 +0530, Nava kishore Manne wrote: > > Add a reset controller driver for Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC. > > The zynqmp reset-controller has the ability to reset lines connected > > to different blocks and peripheral in the Soc. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nava kishore Manne <nava.manne@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes for v3: > > -None. > > Changes for v2: > > -Moved eemi_ops into a priv struct as suggested > > by philipp. > > > > drivers/reset/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/reset/reset-zynqmp.c | 115 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 116 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/reset/reset-zynqmp.c > > > > diff --git a/drivers/reset/Makefile b/drivers/reset/Makefile index > > c1261dc..27e4a33 100644 > > --- a/drivers/reset/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/reset/Makefile > > @@ -21,4 +21,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_TI_SCI) += reset-ti-sci.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_TI_SYSCON) += reset-ti-syscon.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_UNIPHIER) += reset-uniphier.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_ZYNQ) += reset-zynq.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQMP) += reset-zynqmp.o > > > > diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-zynqmp.c > > b/drivers/reset/reset-zynqmp.c new file mode 100644 index > > 0000000..f908492 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-zynqmp.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > > +/* > > + * Copyright (C) 2018 Xilinx, Inc. > > + * > > + */ > > + > > +#include <linux/io.h> > > I think including io.h is not necessary. > > [...] Will fix in the next version. > > +static int zynqmp_reset_status(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, > > + unsigned long id) > > +{ > > + struct zynqmp_reset_data *priv = to_zynqmp_reset_data(rcdev); > > + int val, err; > > + > > + err = priv->eemi_ops->reset_get_status(ZYNQMP_RESET_ID + id, &val); > > + if (!err) > > + return -EINVAL; > > This looks like it should be > > if (err) > return err; > > instead. > > [...] Will fix in the next version. > > +static struct reset_control_ops zynqmp_reset_ops = { > > static const struct reset_control_ops zynqmp_reset_ops = { > Will fix in the next version. > > + .reset = zynqmp_reset_reset, > > + .assert = zynqmp_reset_assert, > > + .deassert = zynqmp_reset_deassert, > > + .status = zynqmp_reset_status, > > +}; > > + > > +static int zynqmp_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { > > + struct zynqmp_reset_data *priv; > > + > > + priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, > > + sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); > > This should fit on one line. > Will fix in the next version. Regards, Navakishore.