On 2018-08-30 05:11, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:42:26PM -0700, Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta
wrote:
From: Channagoud Kadabi <ckadabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add error reporting driver for Single Bit Errors (SBEs) and Double Bit
Errors (DBEs). As of now, this driver supports error reporting for
Last Level Cache Controller (LLCC) of Tag RAM and Data RAM. Interrupts
are triggered when the errors happen in the cache, the driver handles
those interrupts and dumps the syndrome registers.
Signed-off-by: Channagoud Kadabi <ckadabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta <vnkgutta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta
<vnkgutta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
MAINTAINERS | 8 +
drivers/edac/Kconfig | 22 ++
drivers/edac/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c | 421
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h | 24 +++
5 files changed, 476 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
We'd also need an agreement who picks up the whole pile?
Andy should take care of it.
(Andy Gross <andy.gross@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT))
Those guys:
Andy Gross <andy.gross@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT)
David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT)
and I ACK the EDAC driver or I do and they ACK the soc pieces.
I have a hunch the prior would be easier...
You can ACK the EDAC driver, rest should be taken care by
Andy or Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 0a23427..0bff713 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -5227,6 +5227,14 @@ L: linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
S: Maintained
F: drivers/edac/ti_edac.c
+EDAC-QUALCOMM
+M: Channagoud Kadabi <ckadabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+M: Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta <vnkgutta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+L: linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+L: linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+S: Maintained
+F: drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
+
EDIROL UA-101/UA-1000 DRIVER
M: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@xxxxxxxxxx>
L: alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/Kconfig b/drivers/edac/Kconfig
index 57304b2..df58957 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/edac/Kconfig
@@ -460,4 +460,26 @@ config EDAC_TI
Support for error detection and correction on the
TI SoCs.
+config EDAC_QCOM
+ tristate "QCOM EDAC Controller"
+ depends on EDAC
+ help
+ Support for error detection and correction on the
+ QCOM SoCs.
+
+ This driver reports Single Bit Errors (SBEs) and Double Bit Errors
(DBEs).
+ As of now, it supports error reporting for Last Level Cache
Controller (LLCC)
+ of Tag RAM and Data RAM.
+
+config EDAC_QCOM_LLCC
+ tristate "QCOM EDAC Controller for LLCC Cache"
+ depends on EDAC_QCOM && QCOM_LLCC
This is just silly: two EDAC config options for a single driver and
this
second one only does:
#ifdef EDAC_QCOM_LLCC
{ .compatible = "qcom,llcc-edac" },
#endif
What for?!
You do this:
config EDAC_QCOM
depends on <architecture which this driver runs on> && QCOM_LLCC
and that's it.
Done, I'll update it the next patch set.
...
+/* Dump Syndrome registers data for Tag RAM, Data RAM bit errors*/
+static int
+dump_syn_reg_values(struct llcc_drv_data *drv, u32 bank, int
err_type)
+{
+ struct llcc_edac_reg_data reg_data = edac_reg_data[err_type];
+ int err_cnt, err_ways, ret, i;
+ u32 synd_reg, synd_val;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < reg_data.reg_cnt; i++) {
+ synd_reg = reg_data.synd_reg + (i * 4);
+ ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap, drv->offsets[bank] + synd_reg,
+ &synd_val);
+ if (ret)
+ goto clear;
<----- newline here.
OK
+ edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC, "%s: ECC_SYN%d: 0x%8x\n",
+ reg_data.name, i, synd_val);
+ }
+
+ ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
+ drv->offsets[bank] + reg_data.count_status_reg,
+ &err_cnt);
+ if (ret)
+ goto clear;
+
+ err_cnt &= reg_data.count_mask;
+ err_cnt >>= reg_data.count_shift;
+ edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC, "%s: error count: 0x%4x\n",
+ reg_data.name, err_cnt);
+
+ ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
+ drv->offsets[bank] + reg_data.ways_status_reg,
+ &err_ways);
+ if (ret)
+ goto clear;
+
+ err_ways &= reg_data.ways_mask;
+ err_ways >>= reg_data.ways_shift;
+
+ edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC, "%s: error ways: 0x%4x\n",
+ reg_data.name, err_ways);
+
+clear:
+ return qcom_llcc_clear_error_status(err_type, drv);
+}
+
+static int
+dump_syn_reg(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edev_ctl, int err_type, u32
bank)
+{
+ struct llcc_drv_data *drv = edev_ctl->pvt_info;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = dump_syn_reg_values(drv, bank, err_type);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ switch (err_type) {
+ case LLCC_DRAM_CE:
+ edac_device_handle_ce(edev_ctl, 0, bank,
+ "LLCC Data RAM correctable Error");
+ break;
+ case LLCC_DRAM_UE:
+ edac_device_handle_ue(edev_ctl, 0, bank,
+ "LLCC Data RAM uncorrectable Error");
+ break;
+ case LLCC_TRAM_CE:
+ edac_device_handle_ce(edev_ctl, 0, bank,
+ "LLCC Tag RAM correctable Error");
+ break;
+ case LLCC_TRAM_UE:
+ edac_device_handle_ue(edev_ctl, 0, bank,
+ "LLCC Tag RAM uncorrectable Error");
+ break;
+ default:
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC, "Unexpected error type: %d\n",
+ err_type);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t
+llcc_ecc_irq_handler(int irq, void *edev_ctl)
+{
+ struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev_ctl = edev_ctl;
+ struct llcc_drv_data *drv = edac_dev_ctl->pvt_info;
+ irqreturn_t irq_rc = IRQ_NONE;
+ u32 drp_error, trp_error, i;
+ bool irq_handled;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Iterate over the banks and look for Tag RAM or Data RAM errors */
+ for (i = 0; i < drv->num_banks; i++) {
+ ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
+ drv->offsets[i] + DRP_INTERRUPT_STATUS,
+ &drp_error);
+
+ if (!ret && (drp_error & SB_ECC_ERROR)) {
+ edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC,
+ "Single Bit Error detected in Data Ram\n");
"RAM" not "Ram". You have a couple of those wrong spellings.
I'll correct that in the next patchset.
Otherwise it is starting to look real nice, good!
