n Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:12 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 06:01:29PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This series does some cleanup of the Allwinner A64 pinmux groups. > > > > The first addresses a limitation on the A64 where we have the eMMC's > > DS in always muxed in. The DS pin is shared with SPI0's MISO, thereby > > preventing SPI0 from being used. In this patch we split out the DS > > pin into a separate group for boards that actually utilize it to > > select on their own. > > > > The other two patches just rename pinmux group node names and labels > > from <func>_pins_<[a-z]> to <func>_<pingroup/pin names>_pins. The latter > > is the style we adopted later on, and is easier to know which pins they > > correspond to, i.e. easier to review. > > > > Please have a look. > > Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> Applied. > > While I want to do some more cleanup, I realized that the label and/or > > node names might be used by distro (Armbian comes to mind) or personal > > device tree overlay files. Do we need to have these remain fixed? Do > > we or can we provide a fallback? (Is that even possible?) > > I wouldn't worry too much about this. We broke it a number of times > already, and we probably will in the future for other stuff, I'm not > sure we have to provide any guarantee there, as long as the old, > compiled, dt still works. OK :)
