On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 01:38:03PM +0200, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
> Signals available on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL should have the same name
> because it is the case of all others common signals, it avoids to make
> mistakes (use the wrong ones) and it makes writing device tree files
> less complicated. For example:
>
> imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi:
> ...
> pinctrl_uart5: uart5grp {
> fsl,pins = <
> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DCE_TX 0x1b0b1
> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x1b0b1
> >;
> };
>
> imx6ul-board.dts:
> #include <imx6ul.dtsi>
> #include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
> ...
>
> imx6ull-board.dts:
> #include <imx6ull.dtsi>
> #include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
> ...
>
> Without this patch, the imx6ull-board.dtb will use
> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX instead of
> MX6ULL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX and the uart5 will be
> misconfigured.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Rob and Fabio gave their review/ack tags on v1, so I applied the patch
with the tags collected.
Shawn
