On 13/08/18 05:34, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > Hi Parthiban, > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 02:22:13PM +0200, Parthiban Nallathambi wrote: >> Actions Semi OWL family SoC's provides support for external interrupt >> controller to be connected and controlled using SIRQ pins. S500, S700 >> and S900 provides 3 SIRQ lines and works independently for 3 external >> interrupt controllers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Parthiban Nallathambi <pn@xxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../interrupt-controller/actions,owl-sirq.txt | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/actions,owl-sirq.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/actions,owl-sirq.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/actions,owl-sirq.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..4b8437751331 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/actions,owl-sirq.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ >> +Actions Semi Owl SoCs SIRQ interrupt controller >> + >> +S500, S700 and S900 SoC's from Actions provides 3 SPI's from GIC, >> +in which external interrupt controller can be connected. 3 SPI's >> +45, 46, 47 from GIC are directly exposed as SIRQ. It has >> +the following properties: > > We should really document the driver here. What it does? and how the > hierarchy is handled with GIC? etc... Absolutely not. This should document the binding, irrespective of the operating system. The word "driver" is completely out of place here. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
