* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [180808 13:52]: > * Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> [180808 12:02]: > > > > Do you need to handle EPROBE_DEFER here? The phandle points to a > > device which has not yet been loaded? I'm not sure exactly where it > > will be returned, maybe it is bus_find_device(), but i expect to see > > some handling of it somewhere in this function. If no device is found the driver just produces a warning currently. And in that case cpsw attempts to continue with bootloader settings. And looking at the caller function cpsw_slave_open() it also just produces warnings for phy_connect() too.. I agree that in general this this whole pile of cpsw related drivers sure could use some better error handling. Starting with making cpsw_slave_open() and cpsw_phy_sel() return errors instead of just ignoring them might be a good start. Grygorii, care to add that note of things to do into your cpsw maintainer hat? > With the proper interconnect hierarchy in the device tree there should be > no EPROBE_DEFER happening here as the interconnects are probed in the > right order with the always on interrupt with system control module first :) > > But then again, adding support for EPROBE_DEFER here won't hurt either, > will take a look. I'll just add some notes about that to the patch description considering the above. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
