On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 11:29:17PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> So I guess to answer my question, you are just making up version >> numbers. Unless you are doing the IP verilog too, don't do that. > > Well, in this case my proposal would be that we change the hardware team's > versioning scheme to match whatever we decide on the versioning scheme > should be as a part of this discussion. I proposed accepting whatever > versioning scheme is decided upon hereto the hardware team before > discussing changing the naming scheme and they agreed to do so. > > So we're really in the drivers' seat here. > >> If you want to use just 'sifive,plic' then I'm fine with that. I've >> given you the potential problems with that and they will be your >> problems to deal with. Maybe you'll get lucky. Plus it won't be a >> problem for the 1st implementation. > > I'd prefer to have some versioning scheme, that's why I'm talking so much > about this :). I really just want to learn how to get the right one, as > I'm quite new to all this and we'll have many of these. Based on the discussion so far I think we should settle for sifive,plic + an actual implementation string suggested by Palmer and Andrew. This is what I have right now: http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/riscv.git/commitdiff/1972707029f8f1216dbe14bd7791295e4b37f560 and which I'd like to send out before it is too late. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
