On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 11:15:02PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-08-07 19:46:01)
[...]
> > Sudeep,
> >
> > Earlier the design was the freq_domain would take the CPU phandles
> >
> > freq_domain:
> > cpus = <&cpu0 &cpu1....>;
> >
>
> I believe Sudeep is recommending something I recommended earlier. It
> would look like:
>
> cpu7 {
> qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
> }
>
> to indicate that cpu7 is in cpufreq_hw's frequency domain #1. That
> should probably be called clk domain BTW.
>
Thanks Stephen, that's exactly what I meant. You have explained all the
details saving me time :)
> If that was done with a phandle and a single cell, then we should have
> something similar on the cpufreq_hw node side indicating how to parse
> the cells in qcom,freq-domain. A property like #qcom,freq-domain-cells =
> <1> to indicate that one u32 follows the phandle.
>
As Saravana mentions in the other email I can't believe it's just made up
of logical CPU numbers. If that's the case is it software configurable.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
