Am Freitag, den 28.02.2014, 22:09 +0100 schrieb Sylwester Nawrocki:
> On 02/27/2014 06:35 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > If of_graph_get_next_endpoint is given a parentless node instead of an
> > endpoint node, it is clearly a bug.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel<p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/of/base.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> > index b2f223f..6e650cf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> > @@ -2028,8 +2028,8 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent,
> > of_node_put(node);
> > } else {
> > port = of_get_parent(prev);
> > - if (!port)
> > - /* Hm, has someone given us the root node ?... */
> > + if (WARN_ONCE(!port, "%s(): endpoint has no parent node\n",
> > + __func__))
>
> Perhaps we can add more information to this error log, e.g.
>
> if (WARN_ONCE(!port, "%s(): endpoint %s has no parent node\n",
> __func__, prev->full_name))
> ?
Yes, I'll include this change next time.
thanks
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
