Hi Michal, > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-kernel- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michal Simek > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2018 11:14 PM > To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>; ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx; > dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx; keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mingo@xxxxxxxxxx; > mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx; Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@xxxxxxxxxx>; Michal Simek > <michals@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Rajan Vaja <RAJANV@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] drivers: Introduce firmware dnd clock river for > ZynqMP core > > On 2.8.2018 22:59, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Michal Simek (2018-07-30 05:50:42) > >> On 26.7.2018 18:36, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>> Quoting Michal Simek (2018-07-25 02:51:14) > >>>> On 24.7.2018 20:14, Jolly Shah wrote: > >>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp-debug.h > >>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c create > >>>>>>> mode > >>>>>>> 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/xlnx,zynqmp-clk.h > >>>>>>> create mode 100644 include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It looks pretty calm over the last several series that's why when > >>>>>> I get an answer from Stephen or Mike I will take this series via my tree > and arm-soc tree. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I have applied 01-08 here > >>>>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/commits/zynqmp/soc > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Michal > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks for merging the patches. > >>>>> By mistake I added “Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx” for > firmware bindings (Patch01). Stephen had reviewed clock bindings only. Please > suggest if I should send a new version with that fix. > >>>> > >>>> I have fixed that in my branch and I have asked Shephen to look at > >>>> clk over chat. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I have some unresolved review comments on v9. I'll give reviewed-by > >>> when that discussion is resolved. > >> > >> ok. Do you want to take them via clk tree or via arm-soc tree? > >> > > > > I'm fine for the clk patch to go via arm-soc if that makes it easier. > > > > ok. Great. > Jolly: Please address all Stephen's comments that we can move. > > Thanks, > Michal Posted V11 patch set with all his comments addressed. Thanks, Jolly Shah ��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
