On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 04:13:26PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
>> + * which device 0 is defined as non-existant by the RISC-V Priviledged Spec.
> /s/existant/existent
>
> /s/Priviledged/Privileged
>> + * Each hart context has a vector of interupt enable bits associated with it.
> /s/interupt/interrupt
All fixed.
>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!handler->present);
>> +
>> + csr_clear(sie, SIE_STIE);
>
> We should clear the SIE_SEIE not SIE_STIE. Correct ?
Yes, fixed.
>> + if (plic_regs) {
>> + pr_warning("PLIC already present.\n");
>
> Got a check-patch warning.
>
> WARNING: Prefer pr_warn(... to pr_warning(...
> #257: FILE: drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c:191:
> + pr_warning("PLIC already present.\n");
Fixed.
>> +
>> + if (of_irq_parse_one(node, i, &parent)) {
>> + pr_err("failed to parse parent for contxt %d.\n", i);
> /s/contxt/context
Fixed.
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* skip context holes */
>> + if (parent.args[0] == -1)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + cpu = plic_find_hart_id(parent.np->parent);
>
> Since plic_find_hart_id() is going to walk up the DT, we can pass only
> parent.np instead of parent.np->parent. It does not increase any efficiency
> either way. So not very necessary. Just thought of taking the advantage of
> plic_find_hart_id.
Yeah, I'll update this.
Thanks for the review!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
