Hi Matthias,
On 2018-07-31 02:25, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 07:43:20PM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
From: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add support to set voltage/current of various regulators
to power up/down Bluetooth chip wcn3990.
Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v11:
* removed support to read regulator currents from dts.
* updated review comments.
Updated regulator voltage ranges?
+static int qca_wcn3990_init(struct hci_uart *hu, u32 *soc_ver)
+{
+ struct hci_dev *hdev = hu->hdev;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ /* wcn3990 is a discrete Bluetooth chip connected to SoC.
+ * sometimes we will face communication synchronization issues,
+ * like reading version command timeouts. In which HCI_SETUP fails,
+ * to overcome these issues, we try to communicate by performing an
+ * cold power off and on.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i <= 3; i++) {
+ ret = qca_power_setup(hu, true);
+ if (ret)
+ goto regs_off;
+
+ /* Forcefully enable wcn3990 to enter in to boot mode. */
+ host_set_baudrate(hu, 2400);
+ ret = qca_send_power_pulse(hdev, QCA_WCN3990_POWEROFF_PULSE);
+ if (ret)
+ goto regs_off;
+
+ qca_set_speed(hu, QCA_INIT_SPEED);
+ ret = qca_send_power_pulse(hdev, QCA_WCN3990_POWERON_PULSE);
+ if (ret)
+ goto regs_off;
+
+ /* Wait for 100 ms for SoC to boot */
+ msleep(100);
+
+ /* Now the device is in ready state to communicate with host.
+ * To sync host with device we need to reopen port.
+ * Without this, we will have RTS and CTS synchronization
+ * issues.
+ */
+ serdev_device_close(hu->serdev);
+ ret = serdev_device_open(hu->serdev);
+ if (ret) {
+ bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "failed to open port");
+ break;
+ }
+
+ hci_uart_set_flow_control(hu, false);
+ ret = qca_read_soc_version(hdev, soc_ver);
+
+ if (!ret)
+ break;
+
+regs_off:
+ bt_dev_err(hdev, "retrying to establish communication: %d",
+ i + 1);
+ qca_power_shutdown(hdev);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
I'm still not convinced that the retry loop is needed/desirable, I
commented on the discussion on v10.
[Bala] : replied on v10 patch.
+static const struct qca_vreg_data qca_soc_data = {
+ .soc_type = QCA_WCN3990,
+ .vregs = (struct qca_vreg []) {
+ { "vddio", 1800000, 1900000, 15000 },
+ { "vddxo", 1800000, 1900000, 80000 },
+ { "vddrf", 1300000, 1350000, 300000 },
+ { "vddch0", 3300000, 3400000, 450000 },
+ },
In v10 this was:
{ "vddio", 1800000, 1800000, 15000 },
{ "vddxo", 1800000, 1800000, 80000 },
{ "vddrf", 1304000, 1304000, 300000 },
{ "vddch0", 3000000, 3312000, 450000 },
I don't have concerns about the new voltage ranges, but you should
mention such changes in the changelog, ideally with a brief
description why the change was made.
[Bala]: I missed to add, I just updated with latest values from
datasheet.
--
Regards
Balakrishna.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html