On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 16:43 +0800, Ryder Lee wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 16:17 +0800, Ryder Lee (李庚諺) wrote:
> > Hi Ryder,
> >
> > On 16/07/18 16:59, Ryder Lee wrote:
> > > Add some misc nodes support - timer and ARM CCI-400.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi | 36
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi
> > > index 9213c96..8cdec52 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi
> > > @@ -217,6 +217,16 @@
> > > #reset-cells = <1>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > + timer: timer@10004000 {
> > > + compatible = "mediatek,mt7622-timer",
> > > + "mediatek,mt6577-timer";
> > > + reg = <0 0x10004000 0 0x80>;
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 152 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> > > + clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_APXGPT_PD>,
> > > + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_RTC>;
> > > + clock-names = "system-clk", "rtc-clk";
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > scpsys: scpsys@10006000 {
> > > compatible = "mediatek,mt7622-scpsys",
> > > "syscon";
> > > @@ -317,6 +327,32 @@
> > > <0 0x10360000 0 0x2000>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > + cci: cci@10390000 {
> > > + compatible = "arm,cci-400";
> > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > > + reg = <0 0x10390000 0 0x1000>;
> > > + ranges = <0 0 0x10390000 0x10000>;
> >
> > From my understanding of the binding description ranges should hold child address, parent address and size of the region in the child address space. I can see in arch/arm64 two different variants using 4 ranges values (like here) and using three values.
> >
> > @Rob + Will what is the preferred way to describe this?
>
> Hmmm... it's just a copy-paste (I take zynqmp.dtsi as an example).
> > > +
> > > + cci_control0: slave-if@1000 {
> > > + compatible = "arm,cci-400-ctrl-if";
> > > + interface-type = "ace-lite";
> > > + reg = <0x1000 0x1000>;
> > > + };
> >
> > Don't we need to add phandles to the cci-control-port property in the cpu nodes?
I forgot to answer this question in previous mail.
Yes, we need it. I will add the cci-control-port property in the cpu
nodes and add the child node PMU in cci-400 - somehow I forgot to add
them.
Thanks for your reminder.
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
>
> MT7622 use cci-400 to improve performance (DMA IO coherence) for
> high-speed IPs. (i.e., ETH/WIFI/SATA/...)
>
> I added it early but actually the related features have not supported in
> mainline yet.
>
> Ryder
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
