Re: [PATCH 4/4] serial: sh-sci: Improve support for separate TEI and DRI interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Chris,

On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 2:33 PM Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday, July 30, 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > >         if (sci_port->irqs[0] < 0)
> > >                 return -ENXIO;
> > >
> > > -       if (sci_port->irqs[1] < 0) {
> > > -               sci_port->irqs[1] = sci_port->irqs[0];
> > > -               sci_port->irqs[2] = sci_port->irqs[0];
> > > -               sci_port->irqs[3] = sci_port->irqs[0];
> > > -       }
> > > +       if (sci_port->irqs[1] < 0)
> > > +               for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sci_port->irqs) - 1; i++)
> >
> > Shouldn't the "- 1" be dropped?
>
> In reality, the last entry of the array is 'SCIx_NR_IRQS', so it's not
> really used anywhere.
>
> The original array was:
> enum {
>         SCIx_ERI_IRQ,   (the only IRQ specified in DT)

=0

>         SCIx_RXI_IRQ,   << copy from irqs[0]

= 1

>         SCIx_TXI_IRQ,   << copy from irqs[0]

= 2

>         SCIx_BRI_IRQ,   << copy from irqs[0]

= 3

>         SCIx_NR_IRQS,   (didn’t' touch)

= 4

>
>         SCIx_MUX_IRQ = SCIx_NR_IRQS,    /* special case */
> };

That's not the array, but the enum.

The array is in struct sci_port:

        int                     irqs[SCIx_NR_IRQS];

It has four entries, at indices 0..3.

> So the new for loop used "- "1 in order to create the same outcome.
>
> But as far as I can tell irqs[SCIx_NR_IRQS] is never used anywhere, it
> doesn't really matter.

irqs[SCIx_NR_IRQS] does not exist!

sci_irq_desc[SCIx_NR_IRQS] aka sci_irq_desc[SCIx_MUX_IRQ] does exit,
but that's a different array.

> > With the above fixed:
> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I have no problem taking the "- 1" out.
>
> But...here's the funny part: It was you that suggested the "- 1"  ;)
>
> On Thursday, July 26, 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > @@ -2809,6 +2845,8 @@ static int sci_init_single(struct platform_device
> > *dev,
> > >                 sci_port->irqs[1] = sci_port->irqs[0];
> > >                 sci_port->irqs[2] = sci_port->irqs[0];
> > >                 sci_port->irqs[3] = sci_port->irqs[0];
> > > +               sci_port->irqs[4] = sci_port->irqs[0];
> > > +               sci_port->irqs[5] = sci_port->irqs[0];
> >
> > You may want to start using a loop from 1 to ARRAY_SIZE(sci_port->irqs) - 1
> > instead.

Your loop is:

    for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sci_port->irqs) - 1; i++)

It loops over 1..ARRAY_SIZE(sci_port->irqs) - 2.
Note the "<" and the "- 1".

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux