Hi Chris, On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 2:25 PM Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday, July 26, 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Thanks for your series! > > > > Unfortunately Greg has already applied your v1 (and my fix for a > > use-after-free), so either these have to be reverted first, or you have to > > rebase against tty-next. > > I assume you would prefer the newer implementation I did. > > In your opinion, which one would be better (revert or rebase)? [looking at the incremental differences] I think the easiest for Greg is to rebase, and send 3 patches: 1. Document interrupt order in bindings, 2. Unify SCIx_RZ_SCIFA_REGTYPE/SCIx_SH4_SCIF_REGTYPE regtypes, 3. Simplify interrupts. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html