On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 4:30 PM, A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jassi Brar [mailto:jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 5:42 PM >> To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>; Fabio Estevam >> <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Mark >> Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>; A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>; >> Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sudeep Holla >> <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>; Devicetree List <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; >> Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; , Sascha Hauer >> <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; , linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux- >> mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, srv_heupstream <linux-arm- >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] dt-bindings: mailbox: allow mbox-cells to be >> equal to 0 >> >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > From: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx> >> > >> > Mailbox devices may have only one channel which means the mbox-cells >> > at least 1 does not make sense for this type devices. Let's remove >> > that limitation to allow the mbox-cells to be equal to 0. >> > >> OK >> >> But please realise that you'll have to write more code -- implement your own >> of_xlate() callback. >> Most developers would prefer to call the only channel as channel number 0, >> and use the common of_xlate implementation. >> > > Yes, that's true because the common of_xlate assuming the mbox-cells is 1. > And there's already such users: > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi > You mean that is a good thing, right? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
