Hi Andy, Às 4:35 PM de 7/21/2018, Andy
Shevchenko escreveu:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:57 PM, Vitor soares <Vitor.Soares@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:This patch add driver for Synopsys DesignWare IP on top of I3C subsystem patchset proposal V6Some of comments below related to style. But unaligned helpers I think is good to use.+#include <linux/bitops.h> Bit operations API eg: GENMASK... +#include <linux/clk.h> Clock API eg: master->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core_clk"); +#include <linux/completion.h> Completion API eg: struct completion +#include <linux/err.h> Check kernel pointer eg: return PTR_ERR(master->regs); +#include <linux/errno.h> Error codes eg: return -ENOTSUPP; +#include <linux/i3c/master.h> I3C Master API eg: i3c_master_register() +#include <linux/init.h> Not needed. +#include <linux/interrupt.h> Interrupt API eg: devm_request_irq(). +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/ioport.h> Used to get io resource. this function: readl_poll_timeout_atomic().+#include <linux/iopoll.h> +#include <linux/module.h> Module API. +#include <linux/platform_device.h> Platform driver API. +#include <linux/reset.h> Reset API. All of them required? Why? There is some header files that are already included by others header files. Should I add them too? it there any rule for that? Thank for the advice. + default:Just return false here? Yes, it makes more sense. + break; + } + + return false;+ for (i = 0; i < nbytes; i += 4) { + u32 data = "" ++ for (j = 0; j < 4 && (i + j) < nbytes; j++) + data |= (u32)bytes[i + j] << (j * 8);NIH of get_unaligned_le32()+ + writel(data, master->regs + RX_TX_DATA_PORT); + } +} + +static void dw_i3c_master_read_rx_fifo(struct dw_i3c_master *master, + u8 *bytes, int nbytes) +{ + int i, j; + + for (i = 0; i < nbytes; i += 4) { + u32 data; + + data = "" + RX_TX_DATA_PORT); ++ for (j = 0; j < 4 && (i + j) < nbytes; j++) + bytes[i + j] = data >> (j * 8);Ditto put_unaligned_le32() ?+ } +}I'm wondering what else you open coded instead of using helpers we already have. I will see how it works to implement. + writel(cmd->cmd_hi, master->regs + COMMAND_QUEUE_PORT); + writel(cmd->cmd_lo, master->regs + COMMAND_QUEUE_PORT);hmm... writesl()? Is there any advantage here? Probably I can use it to fill the TX buffer with this. + info->pid = (u64)readl(master->regs + SLV_PID_VALUE);Why explicit casting? info->pid is u64 size. + u32 r; + + + core_rate = clk_get_rate(master->core_clk);Too many blank lines in between. For me in that way it's better to filter code parts. Do you think that is not readable? + +Ditto.+ /* Prepare DAT before launching DAA. */ + for (pos = 0; pos < master->maxdevs; pos++) { + if (olddevs & BIT(pos)) + continue; + + ret = i3c_master_get_free_addr(m, last_addr + 1); + if (ret < 0) + return -ENOSPC; + master->addrs[pos] = ret;+ p = (ret >> 6) ^ (ret >> 5) ^ (ret >> 4) ^ (ret >> 3) ^ + (ret >> 2) ^ (ret >> 1) ^ ret ^ 1; + p = p & 1;Is it parity calculus? Do we have something implemented in kernel already? Btw, https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__graphics.stanford.edu_-7Eseander_bithacks.html-23ParityNaive&d=DwIBaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=qVuU64u9x77Y0Kd0PhDK_lpxFgg6PK9PateHwjb_DY0&m=5FpGHBbT8tYA6PB4RT_9O6PJk3v-wYcy1MV59xoqK4I&s=FSJ3EcuoxPtRJWmsk9Yt4s_UH9kxFBam01Xvas2ZFdo&e= offered this v ^= v >> 4; v &= 0xf; v = (0x6996 >> v) & 1; I search into the kernel and I didn't find any function for that. In your opinion what shoud I use? Thanks for your feedback. Regards, Vitor Soares |