On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 17:31 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 17:16:33 MSK Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 15:44 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >
> > > On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 15:24:34 MSK Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sorry, I meant to write "minor revamp" in the subject line here
> > > > as
> > > > Apalis TK1 was already in quite good a shape but this are still
> > > > some
> > > > worthy improvements (;-p).
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 12:42 +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Marcel,
> > >
> > > All your emails that are sent from "toradex.com" are treated as
> > > spam
> > > by Gmail
> > > because "This message has a from address in toradex.com but has
> > > failed
> > > toradex.com's required tests for authentication.", is there
> > > anything
> > > you could
> > > do to fix that?
> >
> >
> > Hi Dmitry
> >
> > Hm, unfortunately, Toradex was an M$ only shop when I joined more
> > then
> > 7 years ago and so far I was unable to convince our IT to switch to
> > some grown up email system. Therefore, I am stuck with Exchange,
> > Office
> > 365 or whatever M$ nowadays seem to call it. Anyway, I really
> > thought
> > sending from Android or Evolution via their resp. Exchange
> > connectors
> > would properly do SPF, DKIM and even DMARC. I just confirmed this
> > when
> > sending something to my gmail address and doing "Show original".
> >
> > Since Linus himself pointed out any of my patches ending up in his
> > spam
> > folder I do send them via my private email which while not having
> > any
> > advanced security configured should still be valid. Moving it to a
> > fully secure configuration including DNSSEC and stuff is still
> > pending
> > on my side.
> >
> > Can you please tell me which exact email it is that you got this
> > reported on so I may further investigate what is going on?
>
> This email from you looks okay. Unfortunately all of your previous
> emails from
> "toradex.com" were getting into the spam folder.
You sure they were from "toradex.com"? The patches should have been
coming from "ziswiler.com" resp. "perfora.net".��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
