Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mark,

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:50 PM, David Collins <collinsd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some
> Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs.  These devices allow a given
> processor within the SoC to make PMIC regulator requests which
> are aggregated within the RPMh hardware block along with requests
> from other processors in the SoC to determine the final PMIC
> regulator hardware state.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt     | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  .../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h    |  36 +++++
>  2 files changed, 196 insertions(+)

I know you are still looking for time to review the RPMh-regulator
driver and that's fine.  One idea I had though: if the bindings look
OK to you and are less controversial, is there any chance they could
land in the meantime?

Specifically it would be very handy to be able to post up device tree
files that refer to regulators and even get those landed, but they
can't land without the bindings.

If that's not possible then no worries, but I figured I'd check.


-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux