On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 07:19:19PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > My preferred solution would to have something like > i2c_new_secondary_device(), but for SPI. This way the driver that binds to > the compatible string can allocate devices for additional chip selects as > necessary. Also make use of the reg-names property the same way as in I2C. Yes, that's at least the most consistent way forwards if nothing else. I don't really have any more appealing ideas anyway.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
