RE: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: arm: Document RZ/A2 SoC DT bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert,

On Thursday, July 12, 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> As the IP cores are the same in all variants, using
> "renesas,r7s9210-<something>" should be fine for matching drivers to IP
> cores. Same for CONFIG_ARCH_R7S9210.
> 
> However, as the actual dies differ between H, M, and L versions, there may
> be integration issues to be worked around. So I think it would be wise to
> use one more digit in the compatible value at the main SoC level, i.e.
> "renesas,r7s92104".
> Unless there's a hardware register to detect the version at runtime.
> But it seems RZ/A2 doesn't have a Product Register
> (PRR), which most other SH/R-Mobile and R-Car SoCs do have?


There is an ID register in RZ/A2 that will have a different number for 
each silicon.
See the first entry in Table 5.6 (BSID register).

Technically, it's not  "PRR" like it's SH/R-Car devices. It's actually 
the boundary scan ID number. All RZ/A1 devices have this too. But with 
RZ/A1, you could only get to this register through JTAG (not by the CPU). 
So for RZ/A2+, they will mirror that register to CPU space.

So with that said, are we good with CONFIG_ARCH_R7S9210?

Chris

��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux