Re: [PATCH v11 5/8] i2c: fsi: Add transfer implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> +	cmd |= FIELD_PREP(I2C_CMD_ADDR, msg->addr >> 1);

I just noticed this and wonder: Don't you need the LSB of the address?
It is not the RW flag, this is encoded in msg->flags.

Also, no seperate handling for 10 bit addresses? Technically, 7-bit 0x50
is different on the wire from 10-bit 0x050. This is minor, though. There
are no 10-bit devices out there. Still, did you test 10-bit support?

Rest looks good.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux