Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] bus: ti-sysc: Add support for software reset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Friday 06 July 2018 04:05 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> [180706 10:05]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thursday 05 July 2018 09:17 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> [180705 14:24]:
>>>> +static int sysc_reset(struct sysc *ddata)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	int offset = ddata->offsets[SYSC_SYSCONFIG];
>>>> +	int val = sysc_read(ddata, offset);
>>>
>>> Can you please just warn and return early for now if no
>>> syss_mask is specified? Otherwise we'll have mysterious
>>> errors if somebody leaves out "ti,hwmods" for module types
>>> we do not yet support reset for.
>>
>> RESET write to sysconfig can still happen even if there's no syss_mask
>> right? Not all modules need to poll on reset status.
> 
> It can but we currently don't have anything similar to
> srst_udelay like we have in _ocp_softreset(). And we don't
> currently have suport for sysc reset done bit.
> 
> So we want to warn and return error except in the known
> working case for now.
> 

Ok.

Thanks,
Faiz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux