Hi Heiko,
Thank you for your patch,
On 06/18/2018 12:28 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Nickey Yang <nickey.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Allow to also drive a slave dw-mipi-dsi controller in a dual-dsi
> setup. This will require additional implementation-specific
> code to look up the slave instance and do specific setup.
> Also will probably need code in the specific crtcs as dual-dsi
> does not equal two separate dsi outputs.
>
> To activate, the implementation-specific code should set the slave
> using dw_mipi_dsi_set_slave() before calling __dw_mipi_dsi_bind().
>
> v2:
> - expect real interface number of lanes
> - keep links to both master and slave
>
> Signed-off-by: Nickey Yang <nickey.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++--
> include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> index bd503f000ed5..6a345d1dde25 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> @@ -230,9 +230,20 @@ struct dw_mipi_dsi {
> u32 format;
> unsigned long mode_flags;
>
> + struct dw_mipi_dsi *master; /* dual-dsi master ptr */
> + struct dw_mipi_dsi *slave; /* dual-dsi slave ptr */
> +
> const struct dw_mipi_dsi_plat_data *plat_data;
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Check if either a link to a master or slave is present
> + */
> +static inline bool dw_mipi_is_dual_mode(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> +{
> + return dsi->slave || dsi->master;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * The controller should generate 2 frames before
> * preparing the peripheral.
> @@ -273,18 +284,26 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
> struct drm_bridge *bridge;
> struct drm_panel *panel;
> int ret;
> + int lanes = device->lanes;
I do not see a big interest here in adding the new var "lanes", I
suggest to remove it or wait for more comments (not a strong opposition
on my side:) just a preference).
>
> - if (device->lanes > dsi->plat_data->max_data_lanes) {
> + if (lanes > dsi->plat_data->max_data_lanes) {
> dev_err(dsi->dev, "the number of data lanes(%u) is too many\n",
> device->lanes);
please use "lanes" has you have created it ;-) or keep it as it is if
you decide to remove the var lanes :)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - dsi->lanes = device->lanes;
> + dsi->lanes = lanes;
> dsi->channel = device->channel;
> dsi->format = device->format;
> dsi->mode_flags = device->mode_flags;
>
> + if (dsi->slave) {
> + dsi->slave->lanes = dsi->lanes;
> + dsi->slave->channel = dsi->channel;
> + dsi->slave->format = dsi->format;
> + dsi->slave->mode_flags = dsi->mode_flags;
> + }
> +
> ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(host->dev->of_node, 1, 0,
> &panel, &bridge);
> if (ret)
> @@ -441,10 +460,17 @@ static ssize_t dw_mipi_dsi_host_transfer(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
> }
>
> dw_mipi_message_config(dsi, msg);
> + if (dsi->slave)
> + dw_mipi_message_config(dsi->slave, msg);
>
> ret = dw_mipi_dsi_write(dsi, &packet);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> + if (dsi->slave) {
> + ret = dw_mipi_dsi_write(dsi->slave, &packet);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> if (msg->rx_buf && msg->rx_len) {
> ret = dw_mipi_dsi_read(dsi, msg);
> @@ -583,7 +609,15 @@ static void dw_mipi_dsi_video_packet_config(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> * DSI_VNPCR.NPSIZE... especially because this driver supports
> * non-burst video modes, see dw_mipi_dsi_video_mode_config()...
> */
> - dsi_write(dsi, DSI_VID_PKT_SIZE, VID_PKT_SIZE(mode->hdisplay));
> +
> + int pkt_size;
I do not see any interest in adding this pkt_size, you can directly do
the dsi_write (below) and remove minimum 4 lines in your patch then ...
just my opinion : )
> +
> + if (dw_mipi_is_dual_mode(dsi))
> + pkt_size = VID_PKT_SIZE(mode->hdisplay / 2);
> + else
> + pkt_size = VID_PKT_SIZE(mode->hdisplay);
> +
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_VID_PKT_SIZE, pkt_size);
> }
>
> static void dw_mipi_dsi_command_mode_config(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> @@ -756,23 +790,39 @@ static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> dsi->panel_bridge->funcs->post_disable(dsi->panel_bridge);
>
> dw_mipi_dsi_disable(dsi);
Maybe you should move dw_mipi_dsi_disable(dsi) call after the if
(dsi->slave)...
> + if (dsi->slave) {
> + dw_mipi_dsi_disable(dsi->slave);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->slave->pclk);
> + pm_runtime_put(dsi->slave->dev);
> + }
> +
> clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->pclk);
> pm_runtime_put(dsi->dev);
> }
>
> -static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> - struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> - struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
> +static unsigned int dw_mipi_dsi_get_lanes(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> +{
> + if (dsi->master)
> + return dsi->master->lanes + dsi->lanes;
> +
> + if (dsi->slave)
> + return dsi->lanes + dsi->slave->lanes;
maybe a short explanation for master, slave and single-dsi 3 cases could
be nice here
> +
> + return dsi->lanes;
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_mode_set(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> + struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
> {
> - struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
> const struct dw_mipi_dsi_phy_ops *phy_ops = dsi->plat_data->phy_ops;
> void *priv_data = dsi->plat_data->priv_data;
> int ret;
> + u32 lanes = dw_mipi_dsi_get_lanes(dsi);
>
> clk_prepare_enable(dsi->pclk);
>
> ret = phy_ops->get_lane_mbps(priv_data, adjusted_mode, dsi->mode_flags,
> - dsi->lanes, dsi->format, &dsi->lane_mbps);
> + lanes, dsi->format, &dsi->lane_mbps);
> if (ret)
> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Phy get_lane_mbps() failed\n");
>
> @@ -804,12 +854,25 @@ static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, 0);
> }
>
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> + struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
> +{
> + struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
> +
> + dw_mipi_dsi_mode_set(dsi, adjusted_mode);
> + if (dsi->slave)
> + dw_mipi_dsi_mode_set(dsi->slave, adjusted_mode);
> +}
> +
> static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> {
> struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
>
> /* Switch to video mode for panel-bridge enable & panel enable */
> dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO);
> + if (dsi->slave)
> + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi->slave, MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO);
> }
>
> static enum drm_mode_status
> @@ -949,6 +1012,20 @@ static void __dw_mipi_dsi_remove(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> pm_runtime_disable(dsi->dev);
> }
>
> +void dw_mipi_dsi_set_slave(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, struct dw_mipi_dsi *slave)
> +{
> + /* introduce controllers to each other */
> + dsi->slave = slave;
> + dsi->slave->master = dsi;
> +
> + /* migrate settings for already attached displays */
> + dsi->slave->lanes = dsi->lanes;
> + dsi->slave->channel = dsi->channel;
> + dsi->slave->format = dsi->format;
> + dsi->slave->mode_flags = dsi->mode_flags;
I though it has been done earlier in dw_mipi_dsi_host_attach() function?
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_mipi_dsi_set_slave);
> +
> /*
> * Probe/remove API, used from platforms based on the DRM bridge API.
> */
> diff --git a/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h
> index 6d7f8eb5d9f2..5fd997cdf281 100644
> --- a/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h
> +++ b/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h
> @@ -37,5 +37,6 @@ struct dw_mipi_dsi *dw_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> void dw_mipi_dsi_remove(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi);
> int dw_mipi_dsi_bind(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, struct drm_encoder *encoder);
> void dw_mipi_dsi_unbind(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi);
> +void dw_mipi_dsi_set_slave(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, struct dw_mipi_dsi *slave);
Tested-by: Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@xxxxxx> (only on stm32 with
single dsi so dual-dsi has not been tested)
I wait for more comments & (minor) updates before giving my reviewed-by
but you are close to have it : )
many thanks,
Philippe :-)
>
> #endif /* __DW_MIPI_DSI__ */
> ��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
