Hi Laurent,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> And if we remove "renesas,sh-msiof", we should probably remove
>> "renesas,sh-mobile-msiof", too, as there are no current users, and it also
>> assumes the same MSIOF implementation?
>
> I'm not too familiar with the MSIOF hardware, can "renesas,sh-mobile-msiof" be
> used as a fallback for the currently support ARM SoCs ?
r8a73a4/APE6: No
r8a7740/A1: Maybe (not 100% clear to me from the datasheet)
r8a7790/R-Car H2: No
r8a7791/R-Car M2: No
sh7372/AP4: No information
sh73a0/AG5: No information
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
