Hi Dinh,
On 06/28/2018 02:37 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
Hi Thor
On 06/27/2018 12:50 PM, thor.thayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add the required clocks for the new Stratix10 clock bindings
to the SPI nodes.
Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi
index 67dac595dc72..9e54282ee08c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@
resets = <&rst SPIM0_RESET>;
reg-io-width = <4>;
num-cs = <4>;
+ clocks = <&clkmgr STRATIX10_L4_MAIN_CLK>;
status = "disabled";
};
@@ -322,6 +323,7 @@
resets = <&rst SPIM1_RESET>;
reg-io-width = <4>;
num-cs = <4>;
+ clocks = <&clkmgr STRATIX10_L4_MAIN_CLK>;
status = "disabled";
};
I thought you already sent a patch for this?
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-June/585514.html
Dinh
Good catch. I didn't see the clock addition in the
dinh_linux_for_next/socfpga_for_next_v4.19_fixes_v1
dinh_linux_for_next/socfpga_for_next_v4.19_dts_v1
branches so I assumed it hadn't been applied (since the num-cs change
from the patchset is there).
This is a simpler patch since the STRATIX10_SPI_M_CLK isn't needed.
Thanks,
Thor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
