Hello Mark, On 06/28/2018 03:18 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:28:03AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > >> OK, great. I guess I'm confused about the "|| COMPILE_TEST" causing >> problems then? I was worried that anyone trying to do "COMPILE_TEST" >> on your tree (or linuxnext if RPMh isn't there) would get failures due >> to the lack of header files. I guess if it's a problem you could just >> gut the "|| COMPILE_TEST" and it could be added back in later? > > Ugh, yes - that'll break things. In that case I can't apply this > without a signed tag from Andy's tree with the dependency stuff in. > Do you have any remaining concerns with the qcom-rpmh-regulator binding and driver patches that would keep you from applying them (other than the dependency patches being applied first)? Thanks, David -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
