On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 06:53:47AM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 2018-06-26 04:50, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 07:10:09PM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
> > > Redefinition of qca_uart_setup will help future Qualcomm Bluetooth
> > > SoC, to use the same function instead of duplicating the function.
> > > Added new arguments soc_type and soc_ver to the functions.
> > >
> > > These arguments will help to decide type of firmware files
> > > to be loaded into Bluetooth chip.
> > > soc_type holds the Bluetooth chip connected to APPS processor.
> > > soc_ver holds the Bluetooth chip version.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v8:
> > > * updated soc_type with enum.
> > >
> > > Changes in v7:
> > > * initial patch
> > > * redefined qca_uart_setup function to generic.
> > > ---
> > > drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
> > > drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h | 13 +++++++++++--
> > > drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 3 ++-
> > > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> > > index c5cf9cab438a..3b25be1be19c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> > > @@ -327,9 +327,9 @@ int qca_set_bdaddr_rome(struct hci_dev *hdev,
> > > const bdaddr_t *bdaddr)
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qca_set_bdaddr_rome);
> > >
> > > -int qca_uart_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint8_t baudrate)
> > > +int qca_uart_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint8_t baudrate,
> > > + enum qca_btsoc_type soc_type, u32 soc_ver)
> > > {
> > > - u32 rome_ver = 0;
> > > struct rome_config config;
> > > int err;
> > >
> > > @@ -337,19 +337,20 @@ int qca_uart_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev,
> > > uint8_t baudrate)
> > >
> > > config.user_baud_rate = baudrate;
> > >
> > > - /* Get QCA version information */
> > > - err = qca_read_soc_version(hdev, &rome_ver);
> > > - if (err < 0 || rome_ver == 0) {
> > > - bt_dev_err(hdev, "QCA Failed to get version %d", err);
> > > - return err;
> > > + if (!soc_ver) {
> > > + /* Get QCA version information */
> > > + err = qca_read_soc_version(hdev, &soc_ver);
> > > + if (err < 0 || soc_ver == 0) {
> > > + bt_dev_err(hdev, "QCA Failed to get version (%d)", err);
> > > + return err;
> > > + }
> > > + bt_dev_info(hdev, "QCA controller version 0x%08x", soc_ver);
> > > }
> >
> > I thought we agreed in the discussion on "[v7,4/8] Bluetooth: btqca:
> > Redefine qca_uart_setup() to generic function" to call
> > qca_read_soc_version() in common code. Did I misinterpret that?
> >
> [Bala]: After integrating wcn3990, calling qca_read_soc_version() in
> qca_setup()
> is not preferable. as we will have multiple common blocks of code in
> qca_setup.
> calling function to set an operator speed is required in the both
> the if -else blcoks
We can probably agree that there is no ideal solution, there is some
ugliness in on way or the other. IMO the conditional
qca_read_soc_version() in qca_uart_setup() based on the vale of
'soc_ver' is far worse than a small piece of redundant code.
If qca_read_soc_version() was done in qca_setup() the code could look
something like this:
static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
{
...
if (qcadev->btsoc_type == QCA_WCN3990) {
...
qca_read_soc_version();
ret = qca_set_speed(hu, QCA_OPER_SPEED);
if (ret)
return ret;
} else {
ret = qca_set_speed(hu, QCA_OPER_SPEED);
if (ret)
return ret;
qca_read_soc_version();
}
speed = qca_get_speed(hu, QCA_OPER_SPEED);
qca_baudrate = qca_get_baudrate_value(speed);
/* Setup patch / NVM configurations */
ret = qca_uart_setup(hdev, qca_baudrate, qcadev->btsoc_type, soc_ver);
...
}
Yes, 'qca_set_speed(hu, QCA_OPER_SPEED)' and the error handling is
redundant, but it's only 3 lines of trivial code in exchange for
making qca_uart_setup() more consistent and not spreading
the qca_read_soc_version() calls over multiple files, depending on the
SoC version.
If you are super-convinced that the split is superior leave it as is,
I might already be doing too much bike-shedding, and after all it
isn't my code.
> > > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
> > > index 5c9851b11838..24d6667eecf1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
> > > ...
> > > -static inline int qca_uart_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint8_t
> > > baudrate)
> > > +static inline int qca_uart_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint8_t
> > > baudrate,
> > > + enum qca_btsoc_type soc_type, u32 soc_ver);
> >
> > Remove trailing semicolon.
>
> [Bala]: i didn't get you.
Sorry, I should have left more context:
> static inline int qca_uart_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint8_t baudrate,
> enum qca_btsoc_type soc_type, u32 soc_ver);
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
This is a function definition, not just a declaration. The semicolon
would make it a declaration and make the compiler unhappy about a
function body where it doesn't expect it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
