Hi Alex
On 06/26/2018 10:44 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Hi Amélie
>
> On 05/17/2018 04:21 PM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>> Enable the STM32 SPI driver, implemented on STM32MP1 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>> b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>> index 89167cd..f990335 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>> @@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=m
>> CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
>> CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI=y
>> CONFIG_SPI_SIRF=y
>> +CONFIG_SPI_STM32=y
>> CONFIG_SPI_SUN4I=y
>> CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
>> CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=y
>>
>
> Driver which are are not "vital" to boot STM32 platform should be
> defined as module. It's the case for this one. Isn't ?
>
You're right. I'll send v2 with CONFIG_SPI_STM32=m ASAP. Should I resend
the whole patchset (with DT), or just this patch and you take the DT
patches as they are ?
Regards,
Amelie��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
