Hi Rohit,
On 19-06-18, 19:20, Rohit Kumar wrote:
> On 6/19/2018 10:35 AM, Vinod wrote:
> > On 18-06-18, 16:46, Rohit kumar wrote:
> >
> > > +struct sdm845_snd_data {
> > > + struct snd_soc_card *card;
> > > + struct regulator *vdd_supply;
> > > + struct snd_soc_dai_link dai_link[];
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static struct mutex pri_mi2s_res_lock;
> > > +static struct mutex quat_tdm_res_lock;
> > any reason why the locks can't be part of sdm845_snd_data?
> > Also why do we need two locks ?
> No specific reason, I will move it to sdm845_snd_data.
> These locks are used to protect enable/disable of bit clocks. We have
> Primary MI2S RX/TX
> and Quaternary TDM RX/TX interfaces. For primary mi2s rx/tx, we have single
> clock which is
> synchronized with pri_mi2s_res_lock. For Quat TDM RX/TX, we are using
> quat_tdm_res_lock.
> We need two locks as we are protecting two different resources.
I think bigger question is why do you need any locks? What is the race
scenario you envision which needs protection
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
