Hi Ben,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:51 AM Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 10:27 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > --- a/include/linux/of_address.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/of_address.h
> > > @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ extern void __iomem *of_iomap(struct device_node *device, int index);
> > > void __iomem *of_io_request_and_map(struct device_node *device,
> > > int index, const char *name);
> > >
> > > +/* Request and map, wrapper on devm_ioremap_resource */
> > > +extern void __iomem *devm_of_iomap(struct device *dev,
> > > + struct device_node *node, int index,
> > > + resource_size_t *size);
> > > +
> > > /* Extract an address from a device, returns the region size and
> > > * the address space flags too. The PCI version uses a BAR number
> > > * instead of an absolute index
> >
> > Do you need a dummy for !CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS, to aid compile-testing?
>
> I didn't think so, as of_address_to_resource() already has a dummy, so
> it should build fine.
That dummy doesn't matter, as drivers/of/address won't be built if
!CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS anyway.
I mean for compile-testing users of devm_of_iomap().
And according to kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> (.text+0x1882): undefined reference to `devm_ioremap_resource'
devm_ioremap_resource() has no dummy for !HAS_IOMEM and
OF_ADDRESS depends on !SPARC && (HAS_IOMEM || UML),
bypassing the HAS_IOMEM check on UML.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
