Hi, CK:
On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 16:05 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Stu:
>
> On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 15:46 +0800, Stu Hsieh wrote:
> > Hi, CK:
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 13:45 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> > > Hi, Stu:
> > >
> > > Two inline comment.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 11:26 +0800, Stu Hsieh wrote:
> > > > This patch add the connection from RDMA0 to DSI3
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stu Hsieh <stu.hsieh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c | 4 ++++
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 2 +-
> > > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> > > > index c08aed8dae44..fed1b5704355 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> > > > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
> > > > #define GAMMA_MOUT_EN_RDMA1 0x1
> > > > #define RDMA0_MOUT_DPI0 0x2
> > > > #define RDMA0_MOUT_DSI2 0x4
> > > > +#define RDMA0_MOUT_DSI3 0x5
> > >
> > > Usually, each bit of a mout register represent a output enable. Is this
> > > value 0x5 is a correct value?
> >
> > In hw CONFIG SPEC show as following:
> > Bit(s) Name Description
> > 2:0 DISP_PATH0_SOUT_SEL_IN 0 : Output to DSI0
> > 1: Ooutput to DSI1
> > 2: Ooutput to DPI
> > 3: Ooutput to DPI1
> > 4: Ooutput to DSI2
> > 5: Ooutput to DSI3
> > 6 : reserved
> > 7: Ooutput to DISP_UFOE
> > So, the value 0x5 is correct value.
> >
>
> From the definition, it looks like that RDMA0 could only single output
> (output to only one destination at one moment). The register naming
> 'DISP_REG_CONFIG_DISP_RDMA0_MOUT_EN' (MOUT means output to multiple
> destination simultaneously) would confuse me. If the data sheet use the
> confused naming, I think I could just accept it.
>
> Regards,
> CK
>
OK, I would change the definition name from
DISP_REG_CONFIG_DISP_RDMA0_MOUT_EN to DISP_REG_CONFIG_DISP_RDMA0_SOUT_EN
> > Regard,
> > Stu
> >
> > >
> > > > #define RDMA1_MOUT_DPI0 0x2
> > > > #define DPI0_SEL_IN_RDMA1 0x1
> > > > #define COLOR1_SEL_IN_OVL1 0x1
> > > > @@ -164,6 +165,9 @@ static unsigned int mtk_ddp_mout_en(enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
> > > > } else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0 && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI2) {
> > > > *addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DISP_RDMA0_MOUT_EN;
> > > > value = RDMA0_MOUT_DSI2;
> > > > + } else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0 && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI3) {
> > > > + *addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DISP_RDMA0_MOUT_EN;
> > > > + value = RDMA0_MOUT_DSI3;
> > > > } else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA1 && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0) {
> > > > *addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DISP_RDMA1_MOUT_EN;
> > > > value = RDMA1_MOUT_DPI0;
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > > index fe6fdc021fc7..22f4c72fa785 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > > @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static const struct mtk_ddp_comp_match mtk_ddp_matches[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
> > > > [DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0] = { MTK_DSI, 0, NULL },
> > > > [DDP_COMPONENT_DSI1] = { MTK_DSI, 1, NULL },
> > > > [DDP_COMPONENT_DSI2] = { MTK_DSI, 2, NULL },
> > > > - [DDP_COMPONENT_DSI2] = { MTK_DSI, 3, NULL },
> > > > + [DDP_COMPONENT_DSI3] = { MTK_DSI, 3, NULL },
> > >
> > > I think this is not related to this patch.
> > OK
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > CK
> > >
> > > > [DDP_COMPONENT_GAMMA] = { MTK_DISP_GAMMA, 0, &ddp_gamma },
> > > > [DDP_COMPONENT_OD0] = { MTK_DISP_OD, 0, &ddp_od },
> > > > [DDP_COMPONENT_OD1] = { MTK_DISP_OD, 1, &ddp_od },
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
