Re: [PATCH 26/28] drm/mediatek: add DPI1/DSI1/DSI2/DSI3 in comp_init

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Stu:

On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 11:26 +0800, Stu Hsieh wrote:
> This patch add components DPI1/DSI1/DSI2/DSI3 in comp_init.
> Because the some parameter for these components initialized
> in their driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stu Hsieh <stu.hsieh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> index 22f4c72fa785..ff974d82a4a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,11 @@ int mtk_ddp_comp_init(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
>  
>  	if (comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS ||
>  	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0 ||
> +	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI1 ||

Why not move this modification to the patch 'add component DPI1'?

>  	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0 ||
> +	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI1 ||
> +	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI2 ||

Why not move this modification to the patch 'add component DSI2'?

> +	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI3 ||

Why not move this modification to the patch 'add component DSI3'?

Regards,
CK

>  	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_PWM0) {
>  		comp->regs = NULL;
>  		comp->clk = NULL;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux