On Wednesday 06 June 2018 02:00 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2018, 07:59:29 CEST schrieb Archit Taneja:
On Monday 04 June 2018 05:47 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 18. Januar 2018, 05:53:55 CEST schrieb Archit Taneja:
Add binding info for peripherals that support dual-channel DSI. Add
corresponding optional bindings for DSI host controllers that may
be configured in this mode. Add an example of an I2C controlled
device operating in dual-channel DSI mode.
Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Looks like a great solution for that problem, so
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
As I'm looking into that for my rk3399-scarlet device right now and
couldn't find this patchset in the kernel yet, is it planned to
merge or refresh these binding changes or were problems encountered.
At least an Ack/Review from Rob seems to be missing.
I forgot about these patches. Rob had reviewed the first one in
the set the second one still needed an Ack. I'll post a v3
that adds the Reviewed-bys and fixes a small typo.
very nice ... because it looks like yesterday I managed to make the Rockchip
dsi work in dual mode following this.
But one question came up, do you really want two input ports on the panel
side? I.e. hardware-wise, I guess the panel will have one 8-lane or so input
thatonly gets split up on the soc side onto 2 dsi controllers?
I think all dual DSI panels actually have 2 DSI controllers/parsers
within them, one on each port. The MIPI DSI spec doesn't support 8
lanes. Also, the pixels coming out of the host are distributed among
the lanes differently than what would have been the case with a
'theoretical' 8 lane receiver.
Other than that, some dual DSI panels only accept DSI commands on the
'master' port, where as others expect the same command to be sent across
both the ports.
Therefore, I think it's better to represent dual DSI panels having 2
DSI input ports.
Your DT looks good to me.
Thanks,
Archit
So right now I'm operating with a devicetree like
&mipi_dsi {
status = "okay";
clock-master;
ports {
mipi_out: port@1 {
reg = <1>;
mipi_out_panel: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&mipi_in_panel>;
};
};
};
mipi_panel: panel@0 {
compatible = "innolux,p097pfg";
reg = <0>;
backlight = <&backlight>;
enable-gpios = <&gpio4 25 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&display_rst_l>;
port {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
mipi_in_panel: endpoint@0 {
reg = <0>;
remote-endpoint = <&mipi_out_panel>;
};
mipi1_in_panel: endpoint@1 {
reg = <1>;
remote-endpoint = <&mipi1_out_panel>;
};
};
};
};
&mipi_dsi1 {
status = "okay";
ports {
mipi1_out: port@1 {
reg = <1>;
mipi1_out_panel: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&mipi1_in_panel>;
};
};
};
};
I guess it is a matter of preference on what reflects the hardware
best, so maybe that's Robs call?
Heiko
---
v2:
- Specify that clock-master is a boolean property.
- Drop/add unit-address and #*-cells where applicable.
.../devicetree/bindings/display/mipi-dsi-bus.txt | 80
++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mipi-dsi-bus.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mipi-dsi-bus.txt index
94fb72cb916f..7a3abbedb3fa 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mipi-dsi-bus.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mipi-dsi-bus.txt
@@ -29,6 +29,13 @@ Required properties:
- #size-cells: Should be 0. There are cases where it makes sense to use
a
different value here. See below.
+Optional properties:
+- clock-master: boolean. Should be enabled if the host is being used in
+ conjunction with another DSI host to drive the same peripheral.
Hardware
+ supporting such a configuration generally requires the data on both
the busses + to be driven by the same clock. Only the DSI host instance
controlling this + clock should contain this property.
+
DSI peripheral
==============
@@ -62,6 +69,16 @@ primary control bus, but are also connected to a DSI
bus (mostly for the data>>
path). Connections between such peripherals and a DSI host can be
represented using the graph bindings [1], [2].
+Peripherals that support dual channel DSI
+-----------------------------------------
+
+Peripherals with higher bandwidth requirements can be connected to 2 DSI
+busses. Each DSI bus/channel drives some portion of the pixel data
(generally +left/right half of each line of the display, or even/odd
lines of the display). +The graph bindings should be used to represent
the multiple DSI busses that are +connected to this peripheral. Each DSI
host's output endpoint can be linked to +an input endpoint of the DSI
peripheral.
+
[1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt
[2] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
@@ -71,6 +88,8 @@ Examples
with different virtual channel configurations.
- (4) is an example of a peripheral on a I2C control bus connected with
to
a DSI host using of-graph bindings.
+- (5) is an example of 2 DSI hosts driving a dual-channel DSI
peripheral,
+ which uses I2C as its primary control bus.
1)
dsi-host {
@@ -153,3 +172,64 @@ Examples
};
};
};
+
+5)
+ i2c-host {
+ dsi-bridge@35 {
+ compatible = "...";
+ reg = <0x35>;
+
+ ports {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ dsi0_in: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&dsi0_out>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ port@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
+ dsi1_in: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&dsi1_out>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+ };
+ };
+
+ dsi0-host {
+ ...
+
+ /*
+ * this DSI instance drives the clock for both the host
+ * controllers
+ */
+ clock-master;
+
+ ports {
+ ...
+
+ port {
+ dsi0_out: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&dsi0_in>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+ };
+
+ dsi1-host {
+ ...
+
+ ports {
+ ...
+
+ port {
+ dsi1_out: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&dsi1_in>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+ };
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
