On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:28:59PM -0700, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: >> From: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx> >> >> Allwinner A64 has a I2C controller, which is in the R_ MMIO zone and has >> two groups of pinmuxes on PL bank, so it's called R_I2C. >> >> Add support for this I2C controller and the pinmux which doesn't conflict >> with RSB. >> >> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx> > > You should have your SoB there. OK, will do. >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi >> index 1b2ef28c42bd..b5e903ccf0ec 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi >> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ >> #include <dt-bindings/clock/sun8i-r-ccu.h> >> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> >> #include <dt-bindings/reset/sun50i-a64-ccu.h> >> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/sun8i-r-ccu.h> >> >> / { >> interrupt-parent = <&gic>; >> @@ -655,6 +656,17 @@ >> #reset-cells = <1>; >> }; >> >> + r_i2c: i2c@1f02400 { >> + compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-i2c"; > > You should add an a64 compatible here We don't have it for regular i2c, why should I add it here? >> + reg = <0x01f02400 0x400>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 44 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + clocks = <&r_ccu CLK_APB0_I2C>; >> + resets = <&r_ccu RST_APB0_I2C>; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + >> r_pio: pinctrl@1f02c00 { >> compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-r-pinctrl"; >> reg = <0x01f02c00 0x400>; >> @@ -670,6 +682,11 @@ >> pins = "PL0", "PL1"; >> function = "s_rsb"; >> }; >> + >> + r_i2c_pins_a: i2c-a { >> + pins = "PL8", "PL9"; >> + function = "s_i2c"; >> + }; > > This should be ordered by alphabetical order OK > If this is the only muxing option, you can also add it to the i2c DT > node. It's not the only option, but other option conflicts with rsb. Should I still add it to i2c DT node? > > Thanks! > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html