Quoting Rob Herring (2018-05-31 07:07:24) > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:23 AM, Matti Vaittinen > <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:17:17AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > >> Hello Rob, > >> > >> Thanks for the review! > >> > >> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:01:29PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > >> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:42:03AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > >> > > Document devicetree bindings for ROHM BD71837 PMIC MFD. > >> > > + - interrupts : The interrupt line the device is connected to. > >> > > + - interrupt-controller : Marks the device node as an interrupt controller. > >> > > >> > What sub blocks have interrupts? > >> > >> The PMIC can generate interrupts from events which cause it to reset. > >> Eg, irq from watchdog line change, power button pushes, reset request > >> via register interface etc. I don't know any generic handling for these > >> interrupts. In "normal" use-case this PMIC is powering the processor > >> where driver is running and I do not see reasonable handling because > >> power-reset is going to follow the irq. > >> > > > > Oh, but when reading this I understand that the interrupt-controller > > property should at least be optional. > > I don't think it should. The h/w either has an interrupt controller or > it doesn't. My concern is you added it but nothing uses it which tells > me your binding is incomplete. I'd rather see complete bindings even > if you don't have drivers. For example, as-is, there's not really any > need for the clocks child node. You can just make the parent a clock > provider. But we need a complete picture of the h/w to make that > determination. > I don't see a reason to have the clk subnode either. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
