On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 03:33:41PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > > Am 31.05.2018 um 13:47 schrieb Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > Using pps-gpio would not allow you to describe the hardware properly, > > something which, for example, may be needed for power management (e.g. > > to power on the GNSS receiver when the pps device is being accessed). > > Yes, that is indeed a very valid reason to do it that way as the pps-gpio > seems to assume an always-on impulse source. > > On the other hand it looks as if the pps framework can't tell the > source when to power on/off because it does not notify when it > is being accessed or not: > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.17-rc7/source/drivers/pps/pps.c#L305 Yeah, we may need to address that when/if we get there. Thanks, Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
