Hi Geert,
On 25 May 2018 10:13 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
[snip]
> Now, given the clock definitions for RZ/N1[DSL] are the same (although some
> don't exist on some variants), you could keep on using RZN1_CLK_FOO for
> the names of the defines, and store them in a common file, included by the
> soc-specific file. But please make clear the common file cannot be included
> directly, so the filename does not become part of the DT ABI, and you are
> shielded from future marketing silliness (e.g. next quarter's RZ/N1X being
> totally different).
How does an include filename become part of the DT ABI?
I thought the dtb is the ABI, not the dts. Am I wrong?
Thanks
Phil
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
