On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:13:14AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:09:47PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > We should be able to arrange to have the ESAI be a clock provider > > shouldn't we? If the clocks need to interface to other things (and they > > do) then we should be able to use the standard interface we have to > > clocks. > Excuse me, I think I just don't get the approach how to use clock API to > standardize the MCLK derived from ESAI IP: it's surely not a fixed-clock > so we couldn't register in DT and it's not SoC internal clock which means > we couldn't register it in the SoC clock driver either. > Could you please shed me some light on it? So register it from the ESAI driver then.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
