On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 8:19 PM, Radu Pirea <radu.pirea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is the driver for at91-usart in spi mode. The USART IP can be configured
> to work in many modes and one of them is SPI.
>
> The driver was tested on sama5d3-xplained and sama5d4-xplained boards with
> enc28j60 ethernet controller as slave.
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
What is the use of it?
> +#define US_INIT (US_MR_SPI_MASTER | US_MR_CHRL | US_MR_CLKO | \
> + US_MR_WRDBT)
Don't split lines like this, it's hard to read.
#define FOO \
(BAR1 | BAR2)
I think I already told this to someone recently, maybe to you.
> +/* Register access macros */
> +#define spi_readl(port, reg) \
> + readl_relaxed((port)->regs + US_##reg)
> +#define spi_writel(port, reg, value) \
> + writel_relaxed((value), (port)->regs + US_##reg)
> +
> +#define spi_readb(port, reg) \
> + readb_relaxed((port)->regs + US_##reg)
> +#define spi_writeb(port, reg, value) \
> + writeb_relaxed((value), (port)->regs + US_##reg)
Names are too generic. You better to use the same prefix as for the
rest, i.e. at91_spi_
> + /*used in interrupt to protect data reading*/
Comment style.
You need to read some existing code, perhaps, to see how it's done.
> +static inline void at91_usart_spi_tx(struct at91_usart_spi *aus)
> +{
> + unsigned int len = aus->current_transfer->len;
> + unsigned int remaining = aus->current_tx_remaining_bytes;
> + const u8 *tx_buf = aus->current_transfer->tx_buf;
> +
> + if (remaining)
> + if (at91_usart_spi_tx_ready(aus)) {
if (x) {
if (y) {
...
}
}
is equivalent to if (x && y) {}.
Though, considering your intention here, I would rather go with better
pattern, i.e.
if (!remaining)
return;
> + spi_writeb(aus, THR, tx_buf[len - remaining]);
> + aus->current_tx_remaining_bytes--;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static inline void at91_usart_spi_rx(struct at91_usart_spi *aus)
> +{
> + if (remaining) {
> + rx_buf[len - remaining] = spi_readb(aus, RHR);
> + aus->current_rx_remaining_bytes--;
> + }
Ditto.
> +}
> +static int at91_usart_gpio_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.parent->of_node;
Your driver is not OF specific as far as I can see. Drop all these
device_node stuff and change API calls respectively.
> + int i;
> + int ret = 0;
> + int nb = 0;
What happened to indentation?
Redundnant assignment for both.
> + if (!np)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + nb = of_gpio_named_count(np, "cs-gpios");
> + for (i = 0; i < nb; i++) {
> + int cs_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "cs-gpios", i);
> +
> + if (cs_gpio < 0)
> + return cs_gpio;
> +
> + if (gpio_is_valid(cs_gpio)) {
> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, cs_gpio,
> + GPIOF_DIR_OUT,
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int at91_usart_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + regs = platform_get_resource(to_platform_device(pdev->dev.parent),
> + IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + if (!regs)
> + return -EINVAL;
This looks weird. Supply resource to _this_ device in your MFD code.
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev,
> + "Atmel USART SPI Controller version 0x%x at 0x%08lx (irq %d)\n",
> + spi_readl(aus, VERSION),
> + (unsigned long)regs->start, irq);
I think I already told you, don't use explicit casting when print.
If it wasn't you, do you homework then. But above is no go.
> + return 0;
> +static struct platform_driver at91_usart_spi_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "at91_usart_spi",
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(at91_usart_spi_dt_ids),
Drop of_match_ptr(). It's not needed.
> + },
> + .probe = at91_usart_spi_probe,
> + .remove = at91_usart_spi_remove, };
Already told ya, split lines correctly.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
