On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 09:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 17.05.2018 09:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Could we not add
>>>
>>> memory { device_type = "memory"; };
>>>
>>> in the SoC level device trees?
>>>
>>> This would save device_type in all other instances.
>>>
>>> That is also how it is done in other places, e.g.
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
>>
>> Not really because the unit address will not match between different
>> boards. The imx6qdl, as I see, has the same issue:
>> - imx6qdl.dtsi defines "memory" node
>> - imx6dl-apf6dev.dts includes the previous and defines "memory@10000000"
>>
>> This is wrong - two memory nodes.
>>
>
> Hm I see. We could add
>
> memory@0 { device_type = "memory"; };
>
> Since the reg property is specified in the board level device tree it
> would be still fine?
>
> Or probably better to provide a complete spec with length zero:
>
> memory@0 {
> device_type = "memory";
> reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> };
>
> Even some boards do that and assume that boot loader will fill it
> correctly, so that should be fine.
That could be the solution although tegra30-apalis.dtsi is a problem
here. For Tegra 114, 124 and 20 it would work fine - all boards from
given SoC have the same address of memory (0x0 or 0x80000000). However
for Tegra30 the Apalis did not have any memory reg before so I am not
sure what should be used. I added 0x0. The other Tegra30 boards have
memory@80000000.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
