> Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> hat am 22. Mai 2018 um 16:10 geschrieben:
>
>
> On 05/22/2018 06:51 AM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> >
> >> Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> hat am 22. Mai 2018 um 15:41 geschrieben:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 05/22/2018 04:21 AM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> >>> Currently there is no easy way to detect undervoltage conditions on a
> >>> remote Raspberry Pi. This hwmon driver retrieves the state of the
> >>> undervoltage sensor via mailbox interface. The handling based on
> >>> Noralf's modifications to the downstream firmware driver. In case of
> >>> an undervoltage condition only an entry is written to the kernel log.
> >>>
> >>> CC: "Noralf Trønnes" <noralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> Documentation/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon | 22 +++++
> >>> drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 10 ++
> >>> drivers/hwmon/Makefile | 1 +
> >>> drivers/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon.c | 168 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 4 files changed, 201 insertions(+)
> >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon
> >>> create mode 100644 drivers/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon.c
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon b/Documentation/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 0000000..3c92e2c
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> >>> +Kernel driver raspberrypi-hwmon
> >>> +===============================
> >>> +
> >>> +Supported boards:
> >>> + * Raspberry Pi A+ (via GPIO on SoC)
> >>> + * Raspberry Pi B+ (via GPIO on SoC)
> >>> + * Raspberry Pi 2 B (via GPIO on SoC)
> >>> + * Raspberry Pi 3 B (via GPIO on port expander)
> >>> + * Raspberry Pi 3 B+ (via PMIC)
> >>> +
> >>> +Author: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxx>
> >>> +
> >>> +Description
> >>> +-----------
> >>> +
> >>> +This driver periodically polls a mailbox property of the VC4 firmware to detect
> >>> +undervoltage conditions.
> >>> +
> >>> +Sysfs entries
> >>> +-------------
> >>> +
> >>> +in0_lcrit_alarm Undervoltage alarm
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> >>> index 768aed5..9a5bdb0 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> >>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> >>> @@ -1298,6 +1298,16 @@ config SENSORS_PWM_FAN
> >>> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> >>> will be called pwm-fan.
> >>>
> >>> +config SENSORS_RASPBERRYPI_HWMON
> >>> + tristate "Raspberry Pi voltage monitor"
> >>> + depends on RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE || COMPILE_TEST
> >>> + help
> >>> + If you say yes here you get support for voltage sensor on the
> >>> + Raspberry Pi.
> >>> +
> >>> + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> >>> + will be called raspberrypi-hwmon.
> >>> +
> >>> config SENSORS_SHT15
> >>> tristate "Sensiron humidity and temperature sensors. SHT15 and compat."
> >>> depends on GPIOLIB || COMPILE_TEST
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> >>> index e7d52a3..a929770 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> >>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> >>> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PC87427) += pc87427.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PCF8591) += pcf8591.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_POWR1220) += powr1220.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PWM_FAN) += pwm-fan.o
> >>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_RASPBERRYPI_HWMON) += raspberrypi-hwmon.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_S3C) += s3c-hwmon.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH56XX_COMMON)+= sch56xx-common.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH5627) += sch5627.o
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon.c
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 0000000..6233e84
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/raspberrypi-hwmon.c
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
> >>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Raspberry Pi voltage sensor driver
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Based on firmware/raspberrypi.c by Noralf Trønnes
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxx>
> >>> + */
> >>> +#include <linux/device.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/err.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/hwmon.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> >>> +#include <soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h>
> >>> +
> >>> +#define UNDERVOLTAGE_STICKY_BIT BIT(16)
> >>> +
> >>> +struct rpi_hwmon_data {
> >>> + struct device *hwmon_dev;
> >>> + struct rpi_firmware *fw;
> >>> + u32 last_throttled;
> >>> + struct delayed_work get_values_poll_work;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static void rpi_firmware_get_throttled(struct rpi_hwmon_data *data)
> >>> +{
> >>> + u32 new_uv, old_uv, value;
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Request firmware to clear sticky bits */
> >>> + value = 0xffff;
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = rpi_firmware_property(data->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_THROTTLED,
> >>> + &value, sizeof(value));
> >>> + if (ret) {
> >>> + dev_err_once(data->hwmon_dev, "Failed to get throttled (%d)\n",
> >>> + ret);
> >>> + return;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + new_uv = value & UNDERVOLTAGE_STICKY_BIT;
> >>> + old_uv = data->last_throttled & UNDERVOLTAGE_STICKY_BIT;
> >>> + data->last_throttled = value;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (new_uv == old_uv)
> >>> + return;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (new_uv)
> >>> + dev_crit(data->hwmon_dev, "Undervoltage detected!\n");
> >>> + else
> >>> + dev_info(data->hwmon_dev, "Voltage normalised\n");
> >>> +
> >>> + sysfs_notify(&data->hwmon_dev->kobj, NULL, "in0_lcrit_alarm");
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void get_values_poll(struct work_struct *work)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct rpi_hwmon_data *data;
> >>> +
> >>> + data = container_of(work, struct rpi_hwmon_data,
> >>> + get_values_poll_work.work);
> >>> +
> >>> + rpi_firmware_get_throttled(data);
> >>> +
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * We can't run faster than the sticky shift (100ms) since we get
> >>> + * flipping in the sticky bits that are cleared.
> >>> + */
> >>> + schedule_delayed_work(&data->get_values_poll_work, 2 * HZ);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int rpi_read(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> >>> + u32 attr, int channel, long *val)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct rpi_hwmon_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >>> +
> >>> + *val = !!(data->last_throttled & UNDERVOLTAGE_STICKY_BIT);
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static umode_t rpi_is_visible(const void *_data, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> >>> + u32 attr, int channel)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return 0444;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static const u32 rpi_in_config[] = {
> >>> + HWMON_I_LCRIT_ALARM,
> >>> + 0
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static const struct hwmon_channel_info rpi_in = {
> >>> + .type = hwmon_in,
> >>> + .config = rpi_in_config,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static const struct hwmon_channel_info *rpi_info[] = {
> >>> + &rpi_in,
> >>> + NULL
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static const struct hwmon_ops rpi_hwmon_ops = {
> >>> + .is_visible = rpi_is_visible,
> >>> + .read = rpi_read,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static const struct hwmon_chip_info rpi_chip_info = {
> >>> + .ops = &rpi_hwmon_ops,
> >>> + .info = rpi_info,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static int rpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >>> + struct rpi_hwmon_data *data;
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> + if (!data)
> >>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>> +
> >>> + data->fw = platform_get_drvdata(to_platform_device(dev->parent));
> >>> + if (!data->fw)
> >>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >>> +
> >>
> >> I am a bit at loss here (and sorry I didn't bring this up before).
> >> How would this ever be possible, given that the driver is registered
> >> from the firmware driver ?
> >
> > Do you refer to the (wrong) return code, the assumption that the parent must be a platform driver or a possible race?
> >
>
> The return code is one thing. My question was how the driver would ever be instantiated
> with platform_get_drvdata(to_platform_device(dev->parent)) == NULL (but dev->parent != NULL),
> so I referred to the race. But, sure, a second question would be how that would indicate
> that the parent is not instantiated yet (which by itself seems like an odd question).
This shouldn't happen and worth a log error. In patch #3 the registration is called after the complete private data of the firmware driver is initialized. Did i missed something?
But i must confess that i didn't test all builtin/module combinations.
>
> Yet another question, as you point out, is why to use platform_get_drvdata(to_platform_device(dev->parent))
> instead of dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent).
Sure this is much simpler
Thanks
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
