On 21 February 2014 20:51, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 21.02.2014 15:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> On Friday 21 February 2014 14:18:49 Tomasz Figa wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Now that we have a broader agreement on this, I think we can go ahead >>>> with the >>>> following steps as an initial approach: >>>> 1. Have a common machine file for both exynos4 and 5 files, >>>> mach-exynos-dt.c. >>>> 2. Introduce a generic compatible string "samsung,exynos". >>>> 3. Append this to the compatible property list for existing boards. >>>> >>>> If this plan looks OK, I can send across patches doing this. >>>> >>> >>> Looks good. I would also merge common.c with this resulting >>> mach-exynos-dt.c, as it would be the only user of the code there. >> >> >> Sounds good. While the naming is not important, I would just call the >> file 'exynos.c', in line with some of the other platforms we have. >> Both the 'mach-' and the '-dt' part of the file name are redundant. >> >> Alternatively, you could merge it all into common.c. > > > exynos.c sounds good to me. Sounds good to me too. -- With warm regards, Sachin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
