On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 20:38 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > First of all, do not remove mailing lists from Cc and people if you > are not sure they do not need your stuff. > Sorry. My mistake. > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Radu Pirea > <radu.pirea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2018-05-13 at 16:33 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Radu Pirea <radu.pirea@microchip > > > .com > > > > wrote: > > > > +static void at91_usart_spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct at91_usart_spi_device *ausd = spi- > > > > >controller_state; > > > > + > > > > + if (!ausd) > > > > + return; > > > > > > Is it even possible? > > > > Theoretically yes. > > I would like to know real circumstances when it might happen. That check was used in debug stage of driver. I will remove. > > > > > > > Anyway the code below will work fine even if it's the case. > > > > > > > + > > > > + spi->controller_state = NULL; > > > > + kfree(ausd); > > > > +} > > > The question is, why you didn't utilize what SPI core provides > > > you? > > > > I tried, but it did not work the way I expected. > > So, what is not going as expected in "SPI core takes care of CSs" > case? > Did you use oscilloscope for that? Yes, I used and CSs was not asserted. Anyway, I will will try again. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html