On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 02:34:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:34:56PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Maxime Ripard
> >> <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:37:49PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> >> Hi Maxime and All,
> >> >>
> >> >> We are trying to bring-up AP6330 Wifi chip for A64 board. We noticed
> >> >> to have an external rtc clock has driven from wifi chip.
> >> >>
> >> >> So the devicetree is configured according to this as below.
> >> >>
> >> >> / {
> >> >> wifi_pwrseq: wifi-pwrseq {
> >> >> compatible = "mmc-pwrseq-simple";
> >> >> clocks = <&rtc 1>;
> >> >> clock-names = "ext_clock";
> >> >> reset-gpios = <&r_pio 0 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; /* PL2 */
> >> >> post-power-on-delay-ms = <400>;
> >> >> };
> >> >> };
> >> >>
> >> >> &rtc {
> >> >> clock-output-names = "rtc-osc32k", "rtc-osc32k-out";
> >> >> clocks = <&osc32k>;
> >> >> #clock-cells = <1>;
> >> >> };
> >> >>
> >> >> &mmc1 {
> >> >> pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> >> pinctrl-0 = <&mmc1_pins>;
> >> >> vmmc-supply = <®_dcdc1>;
> >> >> vqmmc-supply = <®_eldo1>;
> >> >> mmc-pwrseq = <&wifi_pwrseq>;
> >> >> bus-width = <4>;
> >> >> non-removable;
> >> >> status = "okay";
> >> >>
> >> >> brcmf: wifi@1 {
> >> >> reg = <1>;
> >> >> compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> >> >> interrupt-parent = <&r_pio>;
> >> >> interrupts = <0 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; /* WL-WAKE-AP: PL3 */
> >> >> interrupt-names = "host-wake";
> >> >> };
> >> >> };
> >> >>
> >> >> And observed rtc-osc32k-out clock is never enabled[1] and the value of
> >> >> LOSC_OUT_GATING is 0x0 which eventually not enabling
> >> >> LOSC_OUT_GATING_EN
> >> >>
> >> >> Pls. let us know if we miss anything here?
> >> >>
> >> >> [1] https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/X2By4q8kD2/
> >> >
> >> > Could you paste your config and the logs from a boot to?
> >>
> >> .config
> >> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/w9w2KB7RFc/
> >>
> >> dmesg
> >> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/mrZGk5bWRR/
> >
> > This is kind of weird. Have you tested with a 4.17 kernel? We have
> > runtime_pm changes lined up in next, so that might be a regression
> > there, even though we tested it with Quentin at some point.
>
> This is 4.17-rc4 do you want to try it on 4.16 ?
No, this is next-20180503. Please try with 4.17-rc4
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
