Hi Bjorn, > > [+cc Tejun, Wolfram] > > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:20:11PM +0800, Yao Chen wrote: > > Add support for MSI. > > ... > > > @@ -448,6 +467,26 @@ static int kirin_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port > > *pp) static int __init kirin_add_pcie_port(struct dw_pcie *pci, > > struct platform_device *pdev) { > > + int ret; > > + > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) { > > + pci->pp.msi_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > > + if (!pci->pp.msi_irq) { > > I think this test is incorrect. platform_get_irq() returns a negative errno > value when it fails. Most calls test "irq < 0" to check for failure. > > There's a lot of duplicated code like this, so maybe we should consider > putting that check into devm_request_irq(), similar to what > devm_ioremap_resource() does, so the driver code could look like this: > > pci->pp.msi_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, pci->pp.msi_irq, ...); > if (ret) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request MSI IRQ\n"); > return ret; > } > > The basic devm_ioremap_resource() motivation is here: 72f8c0bfa0de ("lib: > devres: add convenience function to remap a resource") and the same > considerations seem to apply here. > > But that's more than you need to do for *this* series. So for now, I would > simply fix the test to check for "irq < 0" and update the messages as I > mention below. Thank you for pointing out my mistake. I'll fix it. > > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get msi irq[%d]\n", > > + pci->pp.msi_irq); > > + return -ENODEV; > > + } > > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, pci->pp.msi_irq, > > + kirin_pcie_msi_irq_handler, > > + IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD, > > + "kirin_pcie_msi", &pci->pp); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request msi > irq[%d]\n", > > s/msi irq/MSI IRQ/ in both dev_err() messages above. This is because the > message is English text (not code), and the convention is that non-words like > these initialisms written in all caps. > > I would style the first one as "failed to get MSI IRQ (%d)" because the %d > there is a return code, probably -ENXIO. > > The second one should be "failed to request MSI IRQ %d" because here > the %d is the actual IRQ. > I'll fix it. Thanks again. > > + pci->pp.msi_irq); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + } > > + > > pci->pp.ops = &kirin_pcie_host_ops; > > > > return dw_pcie_host_init(&pci->pp); > > -- > > 1.9.1 > > Best regards, Yao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html